Published: May 1, 1991
Where Everybody Knows Your Name SOCIOLOGIST JAMES COLEMAN, IN HIS
book Public and Private Schools: The Impact of Communities, argues that
school failure for many children is directly related to the erosion of
"social capital'' in contemporary society. Coleman defines social
capital as "the norms, the social networks, and the relationships
between adults and children that are of value for the child's growing
up''--specifically the family and the community. In the community,
social capital exists in the "interest, even the intrusiveness, of one
adult in the activities of someone else's child.'' The deterioration of
family and community, says Coleman, has led to a fundamental vacuum--a
loss of institutions that "induce the kinds of attitudes, effort, and
conception of self that children and youth need to succeed in school
and as adults.'' The article on Newtown, Mo., beginning on page 40 is,
in a very real sense, about social capital. Rural communities like
Newtown are among the few remaining places in this nation where
children find close and caring support from a community of adults. The
teachers at Newtown-Harris School know not only their pupils and their
parents but also their grandparents, aunts, uncles, neighbors, and
friends. As one of the teachers says, "In Newtown, everybody knows
everybody, and the familiarity--indeed the intimacy--is part of what
makes Newtown's school so special.'' But, as the title of the article
implies, schools like Newtown-Harris are becoming endangered species as
the rural population in the United States continues its steady decline.
And when the schools close, the communities-- along with their rare
social capital--also die. There is a sad paradox here. The very
characteristics we are seeking to create in our urban and suburban
schools already exist in our disappearing rural schools: real parental
involvement in schools and local interest and support (i.e., social
capital); small classes; flexibility in school structure and
scheduling; collaboration among teachers and cooperative learning among
students; more personal attention for students; the elimination of
tracking and allowing kids to move at their own pace; and the use of
technology to facilitate learning. Newtown-Harris School--like most
rural schools--has all of this but is still on the verge of extinction.
Someone once said, "Only a fool would attempt to stop the march of
time.'' And the direction of that march in this nation has clearly
been--and will continue to be--toward an urban society. But does that
mean nothing can or should be done to preserve schools like
Newtown-Harris for as long as possible? Is the only solution to go on
consolidating such schools into ever larger unified schools that
ultimately embody so many of the negative characteristics that the
current school reform movement laments? As long as there are students
to learn and teachers willing to teach them, small, rural schools have
an important function to perform. They die because eventually they
cannot find the necessary funding to continue or because they are too
small to meet all the academic requirements imposed upon them by state
law. Both of those are policy issues. If the state deemed rural schools
worth saving, it could allocate the necessary resources. After all, if
a school like NewtownHarris disappears, its 83 students will still have
to be educated. And those students would have to be bused (perhaps two
or more hours each day) to another school, which very likely would also
be struggling with financial problems. Economies of scale would
probably result in a somewhat lower per-pupil expenditure, but what the
students lose may be far greater than the monetary savings of
transferring them. The Newtown teachers and administrators have a tacit
agreement that if they cannot provide their children with a "quality
education,'' they will close the school. But a high-quality education
is by no means synonymous with state education requirements. Good
teachers and motivated students in an environment like the one in
NewtownHarris School can light the lamp of lifelong learning, even if
their curriculum is not as broad as that in the "shopping mall high
school.'' And with the inventive use of technology and
distance-learning programs, rural schools can offer their students a
more-than-adequate curriculum. Milton Eisenhower, who often reminisced
about his childhood with Ike in rural Kansas, once said: "The essence
of nostalgia is the awareness that what has been will never be again.''
All the more reason for doing all that can be done now to nourish
schools like Newtown-Harris.
Web Only
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TM Archive